Sell Sight-Reading and Ear-Training Feedback Online

Sell sight-reading and ear-training feedback by packaging it as a Brillay Custom Work: a student submits a recording of an unfamiliar piece read at sight, or their answers to an interval/chord/rhythm dictation drill, and the teacher returns a scored, timestamped critique for a set price and turnaround. This prices a narrow technical skill separately from general practice review. Custom Work lets you offer clearly scoped commissions and services: you set the price, the scope and the delivery time, and followers submit a brief and pay before you start.

No monthly fee, you only pay a small platform fee when you get paid. 8% platform fee when a follower pays for work, 5% platform fee on tips and goals. Card processing is separate. pricing

Sight-reading and ear training are scored as separate components in the major graded-exam systems, which is one reason students keep sending them over between lessons: a cold read of a new excerpt, or a completed interval-naming or dictation drill, arrives "just to check." That request is narrow and skill-specific — it is not a full practice-session review, and it is not a conceptual theory question — which is why it can be priced and scoped on its own instead of folded into either, the same overflow-demand pattern that shows up when language exchange partners start charging for the extra correction time instead of folding it into a free swap.

ABRSM marks its Practical Grade exams out of 150 points, awarding a maximum of 21 marks for sight-reading and 18 marks for aural tests, with 100 marks required for a pass (ABRSM, About Practical Grades). College Board's AP Music Theory exam scores sight-singing as its own free-response component worth 10% of the exam, asking students to sing two brief, primarily diatonic melodies of about 4-8 bars with 75 seconds to examine and practice each one and 30 seconds to perform it (AP Music Theory, About the Exam). Both boards isolate these skills as separately weighted, separately timed tasks, which is a useful model for a teacher deciding how to price the same skill as a standalone offer.

What counts as sight-reading and ear-training feedback?

Sight-reading feedback reviews how a student performs an unfamiliar piece on first read; ear-training feedback reviews how accurately they identify what they hear — intervals, chords, rhythms, or short melodic dictations. Both are graded against a specific, repeatable drill rather than an open-ended practice session or a conceptual "why does this work" theory question.

The AP Music Theory exam separates the two skill types structurally: its written free-response section is worth 45% of the exam score and contains seven questions, of which two are melodic dictation and two are harmonic dictation, while sight-singing is scored separately at 10%. Sight-reading (turning notation into sound) and dictation (hearing sound and writing or naming it) are treated as related but distinct tasks — a distinction worth keeping in a paid offer, since a student who struggles with one does not necessarily struggle with the other.

Is this a Paid Question or a custom request?

Sight-reading and ear-training feedback should be sold through Brillay's Custom Work rather than Paid Questions because Custom Work accepts the recording or completed drill sheet from the follower. Paid Questions are one typed question and one written reply (how it works).

A Paid Question covers the one-off theory question instead; see charging for a quick music theory question for how that narrower, one-question, one-written-reply offer is scoped, and Custom Work for the price-plus-delivery time format used for drill feedback.

What should a sight-reading/ear-training listing include?

Before a student pays, state the drill format, the file type to submit, your delivery time, and exactly what your feedback covers. Naming the excluded work — no full lesson, no exam-board transcript — matters as much as naming what is included in the package, the same discipline behind scoping a one-time study guide to a single college course's syllabus instead of open-ended tutoring.

In the Brillay team's own experience writing service listings, the requests that end up declined are usually the ones where the listing never said what to send. You can decline a request, but a listing that names the format up front avoids the round trip.

• Input: One sight-reading recording (unfamiliar excerpt, first read) or one completed ear-training drill (interval/chord ID, rhythm or melodic dictation).
• Level/source: State whether the student picks the excerpt or the teacher assigns it from a set list, and roughly what grade/level it targets.
• Deliverable: Written notes, a marked-up score or answer sheet, a voice-over critique, or a combination.
• Scoring format: Whether feedback is a simple right/wrong tally, a rubric score, or open-ended notes.
• Delivery time: A specific window within Brillay's cap of up to five days for Custom Work.
• Exclusions: State plainly that the review is not a full lesson, a syllabus, or a graded transcript for a school or exam board.

Trinity College London marks its face-to-face graded music exams out of 100, with two supporting tests chosen from sight reading, aural, improvisation and musical knowledge worth 20 of those marks, and sight reading is optional up to Grade 5 but compulsory from Grade 6 onward (Trinity College London, About our Graded exams). Trinity also publishes the difficulty convention it uses for the sight-reading extract itself:

"This test assesses candidates' ability to perform a previously unseen musical extract, at a level approximately two grades lower than the exam being taken." — Trinity College London, Supporting tests for face-to-face exams (via trinitycollege.com)

Trinity's two-grades-lower convention is a ready-made way to set excerpt difficulty inside a listing: name the target grade, then assign or accept material roughly two grades below it.

A Université Laval study of 54 postsecondary music students found that university students scored a mean of 18.35 on sight-singing pitch accuracy versus 13.08 for pre-university cegep students (p =.01), and that educational level plus the age a student began learning music together predicted 24% of pitch-score variance, F(2, 51) = 9.15, p =.0004 (Pomerleau-Turcotte et al., Journal of Research in Music Education, via PMC). That gap is a reason to ask a student's level and start age before pricing or scoping feedback: a beginner's cold read and an advancing conservatory student's cold read are not the same review to grade.

How do you price a sight-reading or ear-training review?

Price a sight-reading or ear-training review by drill length and feedback depth rather than a flat per-minute rate: a two-line cold read costs less teacher time to grade than a full dictation worksheet. With Custom Work, you set the price and delivery time, so tiering by scope is straightforward — the same structure used to price a chapter-length thesis or dissertation review by length and depth rather than a flat rate.

The Brillay team knows of no published market-rate benchmark for async sight-reading or ear-training feedback specifically — the exam boards publish marking schemes and pass thresholds, not teaching rates. Every figure in the table below is therefore an illustrative structure written by the Brillay team, not a researched price; actual pricing depends on audience, demand, positioning, and the teacher's own experience.

ABRSM publishes three result bands for its Practical Grades — Pass at 100-119 marks, Merit at 120-129, and Distinction at 130-150 out of a possible 150. A student chasing a Distinction wants more detail than one aiming to clear the pass mark, which is a fair basis for selling a deeper review tier.

Any price shown here is an example only, not a guarantee of demand or earnings.

What does effective sight-reading feedback actually cover?

Effective sight-reading feedback names the pattern behind the miss — rhythm displacement, losing the pulse at a page turn, a misread key signature — rather than only listing wrong notes. Effective ear-training feedback does the same thing: naming which interval or chord quality was consistently confused matters more than a raw right/wrong count — the same error-pattern approach used in a paid written correction offer that flags a recurring mistake instead of just marking a sentence wrong.

"Sight-singing also requires audiation, which is the ability to 'think' musically, and this ability usually requires extensive experience with music acquired from a young age." — Pomerleau-Turcotte, Moreno Sala, Dubé and Vachon, Journal of Research in Music Education (PMC)

The audiation framing supports feedback that separates two different failure modes: a student who cannot yet "hear ahead" while reading, versus a student who hears the line correctly but hesitates executing it. A teacher who names which failure mode is happening gives the student something concrete to drill before the next submission.

In the same Université Laval study, rhythm scores did not differ significantly between the two student groups (cegep mean 18.43 versus university mean 20.06, p =.22) even though pitch scores did (Pomerleau-Turcotte et al., Journal of Research in Music Education, via PMC). That split is an argument for grading pitch accuracy and rhythm accuracy as separate lines rather than one blended score.

What else can you sell alongside skill-drill feedback?

Sight-reading and ear-training review works best kept narrow, with adjacent requests routed to separate offers on the same page. Brillay supports five other offer types alongside Custom Work — Paid Questions, Personalized Videos, Tips, Goals, and Brand Collaboration Inquiries.

• Practice recording review: feedback on a general practice session, not one isolated skill drill.
• Personalized Videos: encouragement before a jury, recital, or exam.
• Tips: a one-time thank-you from a supporter, with nothing to deliver in return.
• Goals: funding toward a specific project, like building a library of graded sight-reading excerpts.
• Brand Collaboration Inquiries: a separate inbox for method-book publishers or ear-training app makers who want to discuss a partnership.

How do you get a sight-reading/ear-training offer live?

Start narrow: pick one drill format — a sight-read recording or an ear-training worksheet, not both at first — then set a price, a delivery time of up to 5 days for Custom Work, and a plain description of what is included and excluded, and publish it through Custom Work.

For broader context on how music teachers price async feedback relative to live lessons, see how music teachers get paid for feedback. You can enable Custom Work without listing a teaching credential in Brillay's setup process; each drill arrives as a submitted file to review within the delivery window you set, not a live lesson slot that has to be booked around both schedules. Exam boards do set their own entry rules — ABRSM requires a candidate to pass Grade 5 or above in Music Theory, Practical Musicianship or a Jazz Practical Grade before booking a Practical Grade 6, 7 or 8 — which marks the level at which students most often go looking for extra theory and aural help.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about selling sight-reading and ear-training feedback cover offer type, scope, revisions, fees, and credentials. In short: it is a custom request because a file must be sent, you set the price and delivery time yourself, and no teaching certification is required to enable the offer.

Is sight-reading feedback a Paid Question or a custom request?

It belongs under Custom Work.

How is this different from a general practice recording review?

A practice recording review covers a broader "here's what I worked on" session. Sight-reading and ear-training feedback is scoped to one specific technical drill — a cold read of unfamiliar notation, or an interval/chord/rhythm dictation task — graded against a repeatable standard.

Can I set a revision count or follow-up round for this offer?

No. Custom Work is one defined delivery; a follower who wants additional work places a new order.

What does Brillay charge?

Brillay's only charge is the platform fee stated at the top of this page — no monthly fee — and it sets no follower minimum for creating a page or enabling an offer. Card processing is separate from that fee: Stripe's published pricing for US online card payments is 2.9% + $0.30 per successful charge, which is the typical US domestic online-card rate rather than a flat universal fee (Stripe pricing).

Do I need a teaching certification to sell this?

Brillay's setup process lets you enable Custom Work without listing a teaching credential. Any certification, licensing, or advertising rules for music instruction are separate from Brillay and can vary by where you operate — represent your training and experience accurately in your listing.

Create your free Brillay page